Thursday, March 21, 2013

Functional characteristics of antitumor T cells change w increasing time after therapeutic transfer

Functional characteristics of antitumor T cells change w increasing time after therapeutic transfer [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 21-Mar-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Jeremy Moore
jeremy.moore@aacr.org
215-446-7109
American Association for Cancer Research

PHILADELPHIA Scientists have characterized how the functionality of genetically engineered T cells administered therapeutically to patients with melanoma changed over time. The data, which are published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, highlight the need for new strategies to sustain antitumor T cell functionality to increase the effectiveness of this immunotherapeutic approach.

Early clinical research has indicated that cell-based immunotherapies for cancer, in particular melanoma, have potential because patients treated with antitumor T cells frequently have an initial tumor response; however, those responses are often transient.

"The cell-based immunotherapy we utilized was that of genetically engineered T cells," said James R. Heath, Ph.D., Elizabeth W. Gilloon Professor of Chemistry at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif. "This approach is the most widely applicable way to generate large numbers of highly functional antitumor T cells."

Different T cell functions are associated with distinct proteins. Heath and colleagues took a closer look at how genetically engineered T cells functioned or failed after being transferred into patients. To do this, they used a recently developed, multiplexed technology that gave them a high-resolution view of which function-associated proteins individual cells expressed.

The researchers analyzed T cells isolated from blood samples taken from three patients with melanoma at several time points after treatment with genetically engineered antimelanoma T cells. Each of the patients from whom samples were taken had exhibited a different level of response to the immunotherapy.

The most highly functioning genetically engineered antimelanoma T cells made up about 10 percent of the total population of transferred T cells.

"However, they dominated the immune response," Heath said. "In other words, 10 percent of the cells are putting out 100 times more protein than the other cells."

Although these highly functioning genetically engineered T cells had high tumor-killing capabilities when a patient first received them, those capabilities disappeared within two to three weeks.

"The genetically engineered T cells did recover their high functional capacity, but those functions no longer included tumor-killing," Heath said. "However, there was another population of T cells that emerged at around one month that did exhibit tumor-killing characteristics."

These new T cells appeared to be a byproduct, through a process known as epitope spreading, of the original genetically engineered, tumor-killing T cells the patient received, Heath explained. The researchers also discovered one potential cause for the transient response to T cell therapy. Results showed that as the patient's own immune system recovered, after its initial depletion prior to therapy, those recovering T cells appeared to inhibit the antitumor immune response.

###

Follow the AACR on Twitter: @aacr

Follow the AACR on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/aacr.org

About the American Association for Cancer Research

Founded in 1907, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is the world's first and largest professional organization dedicated to advancing cancer research and its mission to prevent and cure cancer. AACR membership includes more than 34,000 laboratory, translational and clinical researchers; population scientists; other health care professionals; and cancer advocates residing in more than 90 countries. The AACR marshals the full spectrum of expertise of the cancer community to accelerate progress in the prevention, biology, diagnosis and treatment of cancer by annually convening more than 20 conferences and educational workshops, the largest of which is the AACR Annual Meeting with more than 17,000 attendees. In addition, the AACR publishes eight peer-reviewed scientific journals and a magazine for cancer survivors, patients and their caregivers. The AACR funds meritorious research directly as well as in cooperation with numerous cancer organizations. As the scientific partner of Stand Up To Cancer, the AACR provides expert peer review, grants administration and scientific oversight of team science and individual grants in cancer research that have the potential for near-term patient benefit. The AACR actively communicates with legislators and policymakers about the value of cancer research and related biomedical science in saving lives from cancer. For more information about the AACR, visit http://www.AACR.org.


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Functional characteristics of antitumor T cells change w increasing time after therapeutic transfer [ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 21-Mar-2013
[ | E-mail | Share Share ]

Contact: Jeremy Moore
jeremy.moore@aacr.org
215-446-7109
American Association for Cancer Research

PHILADELPHIA Scientists have characterized how the functionality of genetically engineered T cells administered therapeutically to patients with melanoma changed over time. The data, which are published in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, highlight the need for new strategies to sustain antitumor T cell functionality to increase the effectiveness of this immunotherapeutic approach.

Early clinical research has indicated that cell-based immunotherapies for cancer, in particular melanoma, have potential because patients treated with antitumor T cells frequently have an initial tumor response; however, those responses are often transient.

"The cell-based immunotherapy we utilized was that of genetically engineered T cells," said James R. Heath, Ph.D., Elizabeth W. Gilloon Professor of Chemistry at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, Calif. "This approach is the most widely applicable way to generate large numbers of highly functional antitumor T cells."

Different T cell functions are associated with distinct proteins. Heath and colleagues took a closer look at how genetically engineered T cells functioned or failed after being transferred into patients. To do this, they used a recently developed, multiplexed technology that gave them a high-resolution view of which function-associated proteins individual cells expressed.

The researchers analyzed T cells isolated from blood samples taken from three patients with melanoma at several time points after treatment with genetically engineered antimelanoma T cells. Each of the patients from whom samples were taken had exhibited a different level of response to the immunotherapy.

The most highly functioning genetically engineered antimelanoma T cells made up about 10 percent of the total population of transferred T cells.

"However, they dominated the immune response," Heath said. "In other words, 10 percent of the cells are putting out 100 times more protein than the other cells."

Although these highly functioning genetically engineered T cells had high tumor-killing capabilities when a patient first received them, those capabilities disappeared within two to three weeks.

"The genetically engineered T cells did recover their high functional capacity, but those functions no longer included tumor-killing," Heath said. "However, there was another population of T cells that emerged at around one month that did exhibit tumor-killing characteristics."

These new T cells appeared to be a byproduct, through a process known as epitope spreading, of the original genetically engineered, tumor-killing T cells the patient received, Heath explained. The researchers also discovered one potential cause for the transient response to T cell therapy. Results showed that as the patient's own immune system recovered, after its initial depletion prior to therapy, those recovering T cells appeared to inhibit the antitumor immune response.

###

Follow the AACR on Twitter: @aacr

Follow the AACR on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/aacr.org

About the American Association for Cancer Research

Founded in 1907, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is the world's first and largest professional organization dedicated to advancing cancer research and its mission to prevent and cure cancer. AACR membership includes more than 34,000 laboratory, translational and clinical researchers; population scientists; other health care professionals; and cancer advocates residing in more than 90 countries. The AACR marshals the full spectrum of expertise of the cancer community to accelerate progress in the prevention, biology, diagnosis and treatment of cancer by annually convening more than 20 conferences and educational workshops, the largest of which is the AACR Annual Meeting with more than 17,000 attendees. In addition, the AACR publishes eight peer-reviewed scientific journals and a magazine for cancer survivors, patients and their caregivers. The AACR funds meritorious research directly as well as in cooperation with numerous cancer organizations. As the scientific partner of Stand Up To Cancer, the AACR provides expert peer review, grants administration and scientific oversight of team science and individual grants in cancer research that have the potential for near-term patient benefit. The AACR actively communicates with legislators and policymakers about the value of cancer research and related biomedical science in saving lives from cancer. For more information about the AACR, visit http://www.AACR.org.


[ Back to EurekAlert! ] [ | E-mail | Share Share ]

?


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.


Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-03/aafc-fco031413.php

will ferrell double fine adventure turbo tax katharine mcphee cold mountain valentines day ideas the villages florida

Heidi Klum Burger Ad: Behind the Scenes

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/03/heidi-klum-burger-ad-behind-the-scenes/

derek fisher lyrid meteor shower hippocrates andrew breitbart red wings penguins the band

The Meeting Of Great Minds Happens In Marvellous Melbourne

Melbourne is continuously increasing in population size and simultaneously increasing in popularity. More and more travellers are heading to Melbourne to see what delights this eclectic city has to offer, while a growing number of businesspeople are also setting their sights on Melbourne as a world-class destination for business meetings. Whether you are planning to host a seminar, a workshop, a meeting with prospective clients or even if you need a space in which to have interviews, you will need a corporate meeting room in Melbourne where you can facilitate your corporate event.

As Melbourne is growing as a centre of commerce, so is the range and availability of corporate function rooms. There are a few points to keep in mind when selecting the room in which you wish to host your corporate event. A logical place to start from is to think of your budget. Are you looking for a small, simple venue for the sake of practicality? Or are you hosting the business event of the year with wealthy clients that need to be wined and dined? For the former, you could look for a small meeting room in a community centre, as perhaps it will be a small amount of people meeting for a short time. But, if you are getting the events coordinator and party planner out, then you should perhaps be looking at a corporate meeting room Melbourne that is part of a hotel or expo centre.

The hotel option is a winner for many reasons. Firstly, if you choose a hotel with an ample amount of stars, the meeting rooms will definitely be luxurious. You can expect delicious food from the caterers, state of the art technology in the rooms, wifi access all around and gourmet coffee made barista style to keep your guests focused and the ideas flowing all day long. The other reason why a hotel meeting room is a good idea is because you have the luxury and convenience of accommodation added into the picture. Especially if many or all of your guests are flying in to join your corporate event, it helps a lot to have the guests stay just upstairs from the meeting room. It allows visitors to be more relaxed, and they could even enjoy a night out on the town with a few drinks, knowing that they do not have to worry about getting up at ridiculously early hours of the morning. Instead they can just leisurely amble down the stairs following the smell of freshly brewed coffee and freshly printed documents.

Regardless of your business in Melbourne, when it comes to meeting rooms youll be spoiled for choice!

About the Author:
John M Wilson primarily writes articles that offer recommendation about planning and booking for corporate meeting room Melbourne. If you would like to use any of John Wilsons existing work please visit the grandhotelmelbourne.com.au.

Source: http://www.articlesnatch.com/Article/The-Meeting-Of-Great-Minds-Happens-In-Marvellous-Melbourne/4494547

Butch Jones thursday night football japan earthquake Star Trek Into Darkness Heisman watch John McAfee Jenny Rivera

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Why the Easter Bunny and White House tours have become the public face of sequestration (Washington Post)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/293380722?client_source=feed&format=rss

Chicago Marathon 2012 texas rangers steve jobs meningitis bobby valentine bobby valentine miguel cabrera

English edition of book by Pope Francis out in May

Pope Francis waves as he arrives in St. Peter's Square for his inauguration Mass at the Vatican, Tuesday, March 19, 2013. (AP Photo/Michael Sohn)

Pope Francis waves as he arrives in St. Peter's Square for his inauguration Mass at the Vatican, Tuesday, March 19, 2013. (AP Photo/Michael Sohn)

(AP) ? An English-language edition of a 2010 book co-authored by Jorge Mario Bergoglio, now Pope Francis, will be published in May.

Image Books, a "Catholic-interest" imprint of Random House Inc., announced Tuesday that "On Heaven and Earth: Pope Francis on Faith, Family and the Church in the 21st Century" will come out May 7. The book was co-written by Rabbi Abraham Skorka, Rector of the Latin American Rabbinical Seminary in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

According to Image Books, "On Heaven and Earth" includes discussions between the two religious leaders on everything from atheism and euthanasia to abortion and globalization. A Spanish-language edition was released in Latin America and Spain in 2010 by Random House Mondadori. Vintage Espanol, also a Random House imprint, will publish the Spanish edition in North America.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/4e67281c3f754d0696fbfdee0f3f1469/Article_2013-03-19-Books-Pope%20Francis/id-742ef4d1df8a45668cf31f26f2c05b75

ncaa tournament schedule kyle orton kyle orton 2012 ncaa bracket john carlson greg smith catamount

Cross Promotional Pets: Clarification - Articles - Feature - Darth Hater

I have the answer to these two questions which I think is what most people are looking for (especially B)

A. In order to get the pet you will have to have received the email mentioning the pet promotion. Then you would need to create a new SWTOR account with that email address. That account will then, at a later date, receive the pet.

B. At this moment subscribers cannot get the items, no. This was intended as a cross-promotion to other EA free-2-play games. However, I can tell you that subscribers will have access to these items in the future. We are still working out both the when and the how. I will share any details as I get them.

Hope that answers your questions!

Source: http://www.darthhater.com/articles/feature/23598-cross-promotional-pets-clarification

dallas fort worth tornado dallas tornadoes dallas weather nike nfl uniforms ben and jerrys free cone day tornado in dallas texas the island president

A Small-Business Office Is Accused of Advocating for Big Business ...

The Agenda

How small-business issues are shaping politics and policy.

For decades, the Office of Advocacy, a bureau within the Small Business Administration, has worked behind the scenes to soften the impact of federal regulations on small companies. It is charged with, among other responsibilities, representing ?the views and interests of small businesses before other federal agencies.? To learn how regulatory policies might affect small businesses, the office regularly convenes round-table discussions with its constituents.

But before one such forum on labor safety in January 2011, an Office of Advocacy official invited a lobbyist for General Electric to participate, according to e-mails obtained by an organization known as the Center for Effective Government. ?You are welcome to attend as long as you maintain a small business perspective!? the official wrote, adding the well-known emoticon to suggest winking irony. Then he wrote, ?Seriously, we would very much appreciate your input and expertise!?

To some critics, the participation of G.E., one of the biggest corporations in America, in a meeting ostensibly about small-business concerns is one example of a larger concern about the Office of Advocacy. These critics suggest that ? just as other divisions of the S.B.A. have come in for criticism about looking the other way as big companies get government contracts or increased access to government-guaranteed loans ? the office has provided big businesses with a back door into the government?s rule-making deliberations.

With a staff of 47 and a budget of $9 million ? and its own appropriation, separate from the rest of the S.B.A. ? the office is tasked with making sure that other agencies consider the impact of their regulations on small businesses under procedures set by federal laws, particularly the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and prods those agencies to find alternatives to minimize that impact.

Not surprisingly, that kind of prodding has its fans. ?The Office of Advocacy continues to be the only voice within the federal government actively advocating to alleviate that burden,? Susan Eckerly, senior vice president for public policy at the National Federation of Independent Business, said in a statement. The N.F.I.B. is a conservative trade association that generally takes little interest in the activities of the S.B.A., but it came to the Office of Advocacy?s defense recently after two organizations separately published critical reports on the office. ?In our many years of working with the Office of Advocacy,??Ms. Eckerly said, ?we have found them to take great pains to ensure they are representing the views of small businesses that otherwise would have no voice in the rule-making process.?

The office claims to have saved small businesses more than $88 billion in just the first-year costs of complying with new regulations since 2002. For example, in 2011 the Justice Department adopted a proposal from the office to allow companies to avoid having to comply with new standards under the Americans With Disabilities Act ? a change the office has claimed saved small businesses $8.3 billion. In this example and others, however, it is impossible to know whether the impetus for the rule change came from the Office of Advocacy or elsewhere.

Some critics of the Office of Advocacy maintain it goes beyond its mandate and exhibits a general hostility toward regulation. They blame the office and the Regulatory Flexibility Act for delaying regulations by months, or even years, and for weakening the final policies. And in their reports, the Center for Effective Government and the Center for Progressive Reform claim the office works too closely with large corporations and the trade associations that represent them.

For example, in 2010 and 2011 the Office of Advocacy criticized efforts at other agencies to lay the groundwork for regulating three hazardous chemicals, citing the concerns of small businesses. But based on e-mails and other documents obtained from the office through Freedom of Information Act requests, the Center for Effective Government concluded that the office entered into these three scientific debates at the behest of trade groups, principally the American Chemistry Council, and relied on them extensively ? if not exclusively ? to frame its line of attack.

?No small businesses objected to the scientific assessments or asked the Office of Advocacy to intervene in the cancer assessments,? Randy Rabinowitz, the center?s director of regulatory policy, wrote in the report. ?The Office of Advocacy made no effort to determine whether the positions it took represented small-business views and interests.?

Moreover, according to the Center for Progressive Reform report, the S.B.A. office ?commonly seeks to weaken the requirements of proposed rules for all affected entities? instead of proposing rule changes narrowly tailored to small companies. Indeed, in at least four of the six rules established in 2012 in which the Office of Advocacy claims cost savings for small businesses, the office pushed changes that would benefit all businesses, not just small ones. In another case, the office proposed increasing the small-business size standards set by the S.B.A. to accommodate larger businesses.

Brad Howard, a spokesman for the Office of Advocacy, said in an e-mail that ?our sole focus and Congressional mandate is and always has been on minimizing the burden on small businesses.? But, he said, ?occasionally, these alternatives benefit everyone.? And the office?s work with trade groups ?is only part of the picture,? adding that staff members of the office also talk directly with small companies.

Trade associations are essential to the Office of Advocacy?s efforts to understand how regulations might affect small companies, said Thomas M. Sullivan, a Washington lawyer who served as chief counsel for the office during the Bush administration. ?Do you know how hard it is to find an independent trucker and get them to read an 800-page Federal Register proposal? They just don?t have time!? he said.

Of course, the interests of small and large companies may coincide, even when small companies are granted preferential treatment. A handful of large companies make the chemical styrene, and thousands of small companies use it to manufacture other products. All could face consequences if the Health and Human Services Department labels it a cancer risk. The fact that no small businesses complained to the office about the assessment for styrene, or submitted comments while the Health and Human Services Department was preparing its report, could indicate lack of interest or, as Mr. Sullivan, the former chief counsel, suggested, lack of time or awareness.

Ms. Rabinowitz, of the Center for Effective Government, sees it differently. The Office of Advocacy was set up to give voice to businesses that otherwise would not have one. ?But in the cases we?ve looked at, and the cases C.P.R. has looked at, apparently, Advocacy is not voicing any unique small-business perspective,? she said. ?The American Chemistry Council is adequately, legitimately and loudly representing the interests of the chemical companies ? they?re a big player in these debates.

?As a matter of policy, why is the taxpayer subsidizing an office of the federal government to amplify their complaints??

Source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/18/a-small-business-office-is-accused-of-advocating-for-big-business/

chaka khan taylor swift safe and sound delilah nevis 2012 sports illustrated swimsuit same day flower delivery valentines day cards